I wouldnt feel safe with the 6 of spades in my hand unless i had the 7 of
spades with it
If one person has the 6, the 7 is irrelevant.
sometimes i’m just so YOLO i definitely would have folded too just so that
i can tell my friends: you know what? i once folded a straight flush, it
was so awesome 😀
that was a bad fold by esfandiari
well I can tell you that Antonio knows that Dan the man loves to play
suited connectors… like 67, 89 or just off suit soooo.. i can see why he
laid it down.. ehh its poker baby.
Antonio felt Daniel was holding the 7s….. so good fold
Yeah, he could have 6, but it was almost 1-2 percent … i would never fold
it… 😉
confess it? he said it on his full contact poker site!
67 of spades is the stone called nuts.
when did he “confess” that ??? and to who ? u ?? terrible laydown from
esfandiari…
Daniel had the 6 of spades
stone cold
actually 67 of spades is the stone cold nuts…
and that’s why your a professional and esfandiari is a retard amateur player
same here
But if one player has the 6 of spades, then obviously the other player cant
have it, so effectively it is the ‘nuts,’ as you can’t make a higher
straight without the 6 of spades in this case. But yes, technically 6-7 of
spades would be the absolute nuts.
He admitted it on his full contact poker site in a Q&A, as a result it was
a good laydown from Esfandiari. Good enough for you sir??
somebody answer please is esfandiari did mistake for fold hand? because pot
where be chap chap/ thanks for response
never call to chop a pot bro.. amateur play ..
i dont believe it, link me the interview. Even then he could easily lie
just to give himself more credit
they know one another too well, it s well beyond the theory books between
them.
That`s why Antonio Esfandiari won 18 milion $ and you`ll never win 1-2
percent of that amount ! 🙂
I couldn’t find that now, I have no idea where to find it. You’ll just hav
to take my word for it i’m afraid
You got to be kidding me… *Facepalm*
I wouldnt feel safe with the 6 of spades in my hand unless i had the 7 of
spades with it
If one person has the 6, the 7 is irrelevant.
sometimes i’m just so YOLO i definitely would have folded too just so that
i can tell my friends: you know what? i once folded a straight flush, it
was so awesome 😀
that was a bad fold by esfandiari
well I can tell you that Antonio knows that Dan the man loves to play
suited connectors… like 67, 89 or just off suit soooo.. i can see why he
laid it down.. ehh its poker baby.
Antonio felt Daniel was holding the 7s….. so good fold
Yeah, he could have 6, but it was almost 1-2 percent … i would never fold
it… 😉
confess it? he said it on his full contact poker site!
67 of spades is the stone called nuts.
when did he “confess” that ??? and to who ? u ?? terrible laydown from
esfandiari…
Daniel had the 6 of spades
stone cold
actually 67 of spades is the stone cold nuts…
and that’s why your a professional and esfandiari is a retard amateur player
same here
But if one player has the 6 of spades, then obviously the other player cant
have it, so effectively it is the ‘nuts,’ as you can’t make a higher
straight without the 6 of spades in this case. But yes, technically 6-7 of
spades would be the absolute nuts.
He admitted it on his full contact poker site in a Q&A, as a result it was
a good laydown from Esfandiari. Good enough for you sir??
somebody answer please is esfandiari did mistake for fold hand? because pot
where be chap chap/ thanks for response
never call to chop a pot bro.. amateur play ..
i dont believe it, link me the interview. Even then he could easily lie
just to give himself more credit
they know one another too well, it s well beyond the theory books between
them.
That`s why Antonio Esfandiari won 18 milion $ and you`ll never win 1-2
percent of that amount ! 🙂
I couldn’t find that now, I have no idea where to find it. You’ll just hav
to take my word for it i’m afraid
none of them had a spade